Saturday, April 06, 2019: 2:00pm - 2:50pm - Back Bay CD
Todd Berreth, North Carolina State University, USA
This how-to session and paper describes a tangible interactive installation at the Museum of the Imperial Forum in Rome, developed as part of an exhibition commemorating the 19th anniversary of the Emperor Trajan’s death. The project was entirely manufactured via “maker” technologies, a laser cutter and 3-D printer; its interactivity was implemented through hobbyist electronics, a low-cost micro-computer and simple scripting.
This project led to an effort to create a generic, open-source project, on how to build a similar installation with other curatorial content, using the same technologies and techniques. It’s designed as a typical “do-it-yourself” tutorial, which tries to simplify the process of fabricating. It’s a simple entry point to incorporating these modes into a user’s curatorial practice, testing their use, and potentially extending the project and its tutorials and fabrication plans, via open-source collaboration. Such work offers a compelling model for open-source exhibition development.
Museums and cultural heritage researchers continue to experiment with emerging techniques to engage the public regarding cultural sites, archaeological artifacts, and museum collections. This happens increasingly through interventions using computational media, leveraging its unique affordances to enable new possibilities for interactivity and storytelling. Such communities are exploring these potentials to heighten visitor engagement, better communicate context and narrative, and generally to activate the experience and generate empathetic connections with the subject matter.
While such modalities continue to spark the imagination of many curators and scholars, a barrier remains regarding learning curves and the expense of developing such engagements, which hinders communities from incorporating these modes into their toolkits. This suggests that there is a need to both experiment with new modes, and make it easier and less expensive for others to do the same.
Berreth T, Forte M, Danelon N . TITA (Tangible Interaction Table for Archaeology). In Proceedings of the 8th World Archeology Congress (2016), Kyoto, Japan.
Chu, J.H., Clifton, P., Harley, D., Pavao, J., and Mazalek, A., Mapping Place: Supporting Cultural Learning through a Lukasa-inspired Tangible Tabletop Museum Exhibit. TEI ’15 Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (2015), 261-268.
Hornecker, E. A Design Theme for Tangible Interaction: Embodied Facilitation. Proc. of ECSCW’05, Springer (2005). 23-43.
Katifori, A., Karvounis, M., Kourtis, V., Kyriakidi, M., Roussou, M., Tsangaris, M., Vayanou, M., Ioannidis, Y., Balet, O., Prados, T., Keil, J., Engelke, T., & Pujol, L. . CHESS: Personalized Storytelling Experiences in Museums. In A. Mitchell (Ed.), The Seventh International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (ICIDS 2014), LNCS 8832 (2014), pp. 232–235. Springer International Publishing Switzerland
Kirsh, D. Comparing tangible and virtual exploration of archaeological objects, in (Ed.) M Forte. Cyber-Archaeology. Hadrian Books (2010). 119-124.
Muntean, R., Hennessy K., Antle A., Rowley S., Wilson J., Matkin B. Belongings: Tangible Interactions with Intangible Heritage. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2015) (2015), 360-366.
Pollalis, C., Minor E., Westendorf, L., Fahnbulleh, W., Virgilio, I. Kun, A. and Shaer, O. Evaluating Learning with Tangible and Virtual Representations of Archaeological Artifacts. TEI ’18 Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (2018).
Shaer, O., and Hornecker, E. Tangible User Interfaces: Past, Present, and Future Directions. In Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 3,1 (2010), 1-138.
Williams, A., Gibb, A., and Weekly, D. Research with a Hacker Ethos: What DIY Means for Tangible Interaction Research. Interactions 19, 2 (2012), 14–19.