Art I Don’t Like: An Anti-Recommender System for Visual Art (5)

Demonstration

Thursday, April 04, 2019: 7:45pm - 8:45pm - Constitution: Demonstrations 2

Sarah Frost, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA, Manu Mathew Thomas, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA, Angus G. Forbes, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA

Published paper: Art I Don’t Like: An Anti-Recommender System for Visual Art

“Recommender systems” show users’ products, songs, and political points of view that are similar to content that they have already seen or previously indicated that they like. While these methods are useful for generating sales and clicks, they are not necessarily successful at exposing users to disparate content. Art I Don’t Like is a Web-based interactive art experience that provides personalized content to users and emphasizes the introduction of disparate content. We suggest a new “anti-recommender” system that provides content that is aesthetically related in terms of low-level features but challenges the implied conceptual frameworks indicated by initial user selections. Furthermore, we demonstrate an application of recommender technologies to visual art in an effort to expose users to a broad range of art genres. We present details of a prototype implementation trained on a subset of the WikiArt dataset, consisting of 52,000 images of art from 14th- to 20th-century European painters, along with feedback from users. Art I Don’t Like is on the web at http://www.artidontlike.com.

Bibliography:
1. Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From You. Penguin UK.
2. Hirschmeier, S. and Beule, V. 2018. Compliance of Personalized Radio with Public-Service Remits. In Adjunct Publication of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3213586.3226204
3. Adomavicius, G. and Tuzhilin, A. 2005. Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 6.
4. Su, X. and Khoshgoftaar, T. M. 2009. A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2009, Article ID 421425, 19 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/421425.
5. Cacheda, F., Carneiro, V., Fernandez, D., and Formoso, V. 2011. Comparison of collaborative filtering algorithms: Limitations of current techniques and proposals for scalable, high-performance recommender systems. ACM Trans. Web 5, 1, Article 2 (February 2011), 33 pages. DOI = 10.1145/1921591.1921593 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1921591.1921593
6. Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., Albert, I., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. 2003. Is Seeing Believing? Recommender Interfaces Affect Users’ Opinions. CHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA. ACM 1-58113-630-7/03/0004.
7. Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. & Trilling, D. & Möller, J. & Bodó, B. & de Vreese, C. H. & Helberger, N. 2016. Should we worry about filter bubbles?. Internet Policy Review, 5(1). DOI: 10.14763/2016.1.401
8. Tan, W. R., Chan, C. S., Aguirre, H. E., and Tanaka, K. 2018. Improved ArtGAN for Conditional Synthesis of Natural Image and Artwork. arXiv: 1708.09533.
9. Abadi, Martin et al. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. 2016. 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16) https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-abadi.pdf
10. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L. 2018. MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04381.pdf