PaperJuhee Park, Victoria and Albert Museum, UK, Anouska Samms, Victoria and Albert Museum, UK
Museum practices were not originally designed with digital objects in mind. They were developed to handle physical objects that are perceptible by touch. Yet the physical elements of digital objects do not solely represent how they function and perform. For instance, although it is a smartphone’s external metallic case that we can touch, the phone cannot function without its intangible elements, such as apps. Media theorists have argued that even if digital matter cannot always be physically touched or rendered visible, it should still be considered a form of material and not just an abstraction. This understanding does not easily sit within traditional museum practices and the typical notion of the museum “object.”
As an initial output of the research project Content/Data/Object within the V&A Research Institute (VARI), this paper aims to provide a conceptual framework to better understand and explore the material natures of digital objects in a museum context. Through the incorporation of media theory, different applications of digital materiality will be utilised to demonstrate how the “digital object” challenges what is understood within the museum as material and what is understood as digital. This is significant, as a broader understanding of both the technical natures and “performative natures” of digital objects, from a media perspective, provides additional insight into what should be maintained within and around an object within the context of the museum.
The V&A’s acquisition of the iPhone 6 as a case study will show how this theoretical understanding of digital materiality can be applied in practice. Findings from the analysis of data collected through an internal workshop, a public engagement event, and interviews with V&A staff, will inform suggestions for the museum. Moreover, it will not only contribute to the museum’s collecting strategies, but also has wider ramifications on documentation practices, conservation, and strategies around display.
Burton, A. (1999). Vision and accident: the story of the Victoria & Albert Museum. London: V&A Publications.
Chan, S. & Cope, A. (2014). “Collecting the present: digital code and collections.” MW2014: Museums and the Web 2014. Published March 19, 2014. Consulted January 15, 2019. Available at: https://mw2014.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/collecting-the-present-digital-code-and-collections/
Dudley, S. (2010). Museum materialities: objects, engagements, interpretations. London: Routledge.
Drucker, J. (1994). The visible word: experimental typography and modern art, 1909–1923. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Drucker, J. (2013). Performative materiality and theoretical approaches to interface. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7(1). Available at: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000143/000143.html
Fischer, S. & S. Lubar (2014). “Collecting contemporary consumer technology.” In O. Rhys & Z. Baveystock (eds.). Collecting the contemporary: a handbook of social history museums. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc, 376-399.
Foti, P. (2016). “Representing the web: how has the National Museum of American History collected and curated internet-related technology?.” MW2016: Museums and the Web 2016. Published February 1, 2016. Consulted January 23, 2019.
Available at: https://mw2016.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/representing-the-web-how-has-the-national-museum-of-american-history-collected-and-curated-internet-related-technology/
Fyfe, G. (2006). “Sociology and the social aspects of museums.” In S. Macdonald (ed.). A companion to museum studies. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 33-49.
Gardner, C. (2015). “Rapid Response Collection.” MacGuffin: The Life of Things, 2, 13-17.
Geismar, H. (2018). Museum object lessons for the digital age. London: UCL Press.
Gramazio, F., & M. Kohler. (2008). Digital materiality in architecture. Baden: Lars Muller Publishers.
Hayles, K. (2012). How we think: digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horst, H., & D. Miller. (2012). Digital anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.
Hui, Y. (2015). “Towards a relational materialism: a reflection on language, relations and the digital.” Digital Culture and Society, 1(1), 131-147.
Kavanagh, G. (2004). “Collecting from the era of memory, myth and delusion.” In S.J. Knell (ed.). Museums and the future of collecting. 2nd edition. Aldershot: Ashgate,118-127.
Kirschenbaum, M. (2008). Mechanisms: new media and the forensic imagination. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Knell, S.J. (2004). “Altered values: searching for a new collecting”. In S.J. Knell (ed.). Museums and the future of collecting. 2nd edition. Aldershot: Ashgate,1-46.
Long, K. & C. Gardner. (2014). “The Department of Public Life.” In V&A Annual Review 2013–14, 62-65.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Vintage Books.
Pearce, S. M. (2010). “Forward.” In S. Dudley (ed.). Museum materialities: objects, engagements, interpretations. London: Routledge, ⅹⅳ-ⅹⅸ.
Pink, S., Ardèvol, E., & D. Lanzeni (eds.). (2016). Digital materialities: design and anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.
Rinehart, R. & J. Ippolito (2014). Re-collection: art, new media and social memory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Rhys, O. (2011). Contemporary collecting: theory and practice. Edinburgh: Museums Etc.
Shep, S. J. (2016). “Digital materiality.” In S. Schreibman et al. (eds.). A new companion to digital humanities. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 322-330.
Sportun, S. (2015). “Haptics: digital touch replicas adding touch to digital.” Discovering Collections, Discovering Communities (DCDC) 2015. Available at: http://dcdcconference.com/dcdc15-digital-materiality/
Trench, L. (2010). The Victoria and Albert Museum. London: V&A Publishing.
Victoria and Albert Museum (V&A). (n.d.). The Pussyhat. Accessible at: https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/the-pussyhat.